<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Broken Covenant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phillip-lee.com/foreign-affairs/245-a-broken-covenant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/foreign-affairs/245-a-broken-covenant/</link>
	<description>The Blog Of Phillip Lee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHJ</title>
		<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/foreign-affairs/245-a-broken-covenant/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>GHJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=245#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Eileen - have you ever worn uniform and served in an active zone?  Perhaps you attained high rank and received strategic training?

I suspect your comment comes from emotive reasoning rather than logical thought, however, to some extent I agree that the fight in Afghanistan may not be one that can be won.

The British army has been defeated in Afghanistan before, admittedly a long time ago, when they were less technologically advanced and dependant compared to today, and when the technology and supply imbalance was less profound than today.  

Yet, it was only 32 years ago that the Russians moved many army Corps, including armour, into Afghanistan, and continued getting whipped by the &quot;peasants in the hills&quot; before having to finally pull back to the motherland.

To continue what is happening over there, the British and the American governments would do well to remember the words of General Schwartzkopf in Gulf War One - &quot;We will use irresistible, unstoppable, and overwhelming force ...&quot; - the emphasis on the last adjective of the three.

If the free world allies want to finally crush and destroy Al-Qaeda, then they have to stop pussy footing around, and go for it without any hindrance from government or funding.  In terrain like Afghanistan, technology can only achieve so much, in the end, it comes down to feet on the ground, and Labour&#039;s funding cuts hamstrung the army when they needed manpower ... but can the UK afford to pay the bill nowadays anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen &#8211; have you ever worn uniform and served in an active zone?  Perhaps you attained high rank and received strategic training?</p>
<p>I suspect your comment comes from emotive reasoning rather than logical thought, however, to some extent I agree that the fight in Afghanistan may not be one that can be won.</p>
<p>The British army has been defeated in Afghanistan before, admittedly a long time ago, when they were less technologically advanced and dependant compared to today, and when the technology and supply imbalance was less profound than today.  </p>
<p>Yet, it was only 32 years ago that the Russians moved many army Corps, including armour, into Afghanistan, and continued getting whipped by the &#8220;peasants in the hills&#8221; before having to finally pull back to the motherland.</p>
<p>To continue what is happening over there, the British and the American governments would do well to remember the words of General Schwartzkopf in Gulf War One &#8211; &#8220;We will use irresistible, unstoppable, and overwhelming force &#8230;&#8221; &#8211; the emphasis on the last adjective of the three.</p>
<p>If the free world allies want to finally crush and destroy Al-Qaeda, then they have to stop pussy footing around, and go for it without any hindrance from government or funding.  In terrain like Afghanistan, technology can only achieve so much, in the end, it comes down to feet on the ground, and Labour&#8217;s funding cuts hamstrung the army when they needed manpower &#8230; but can the UK afford to pay the bill nowadays anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen Critchley</title>
		<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/foreign-affairs/245-a-broken-covenant/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen Critchley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=245#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Want to support our troops? Then try not sending them to fight battles they can’t win! &#039;Shameful&#039; not &#039;special&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to support our troops? Then try not sending them to fight battles they can’t win! &#8216;Shameful&#8217; not &#8216;special&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

