Labour are stuck in two wars. Their electoral prospects are undeniably being harmed by the one in Iraq. Afghanistan, however, still appears to retain public support. There is a sense that the operation in Helmand province has defined objectives: the crushing of Taleban resistance, the eradication of poppy production, and the support of a democratically-elected government. It is also seen by some as “taking it to al-Qaeda”. My problem with the war in Afghanistan is that depending upon who in goverment is being interviewed determines the objective being followed. Why do the Labour government appear to be increasing the number objectives to justify their involvement in Afghanistan? I am suspicious that part of their exit strategy from Iraq may be a ‘need’ for further force increases in Afghanistan, i.e. dividing the problem. To my mind the conflict in Afghanistan is only worthy because of its implicit support for the embryonic government in Kabul. If that warrants more forces then so be it. To talk up other objectives would be disingenuous. I am naturally suspicious of this Labour government’s foreign policy adventures. False claims were the basis for their last foray into a foreign country.