<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polly&#039;s Poor Defence of the Poor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phillip-lee.com/politics-home/197-pollys-poor-defence-of-the-poor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/politics-home/197-pollys-poor-defence-of-the-poor/</link>
	<description>The Blog Of Phillip Lee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GHJ</title>
		<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/politics-home/197-pollys-poor-defence-of-the-poor/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>GHJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=197#comment-563</guid>
		<description>In many ways I have to concur.  My thought about the Labour Party (pre-Blair) was that the only social mobility it condoned was to drag the upper echelons down to the middle classes via taxation, and to push the lower classes into the middle layer via wage increases that businesses and industry could not sustain.

I know many look upon the Iron Maiden as the killer of British heavy industry, but to me, the cancer that caused that situation was created by the Labour and union movements under the governments before hers.  Her toughness in defeating the unions was the right direction, but unfortunately too late to stop the patient from croaking.

However, three decades later, her successors do need to refocus on the vulnerable in our society.  Tory Blair&#039;s (intended spelling) policies appear to have disenfranchised and debilitated those most at risk, and as yet I don&#039;t see David Macaroon redressing that situation.  

The poor and vulnerable of this country need a champion in the current government, before it is too late for rectification to occur.  They don&#039;t need some lapdog yapping behind the letterbox, they need a full size barker to chase off the pension and benefit pilferers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many ways I have to concur.  My thought about the Labour Party (pre-Blair) was that the only social mobility it condoned was to drag the upper echelons down to the middle classes via taxation, and to push the lower classes into the middle layer via wage increases that businesses and industry could not sustain.</p>
<p>I know many look upon the Iron Maiden as the killer of British heavy industry, but to me, the cancer that caused that situation was created by the Labour and union movements under the governments before hers.  Her toughness in defeating the unions was the right direction, but unfortunately too late to stop the patient from croaking.</p>
<p>However, three decades later, her successors do need to refocus on the vulnerable in our society.  Tory Blair&#8217;s (intended spelling) policies appear to have disenfranchised and debilitated those most at risk, and as yet I don&#8217;t see David Macaroon redressing that situation.  </p>
<p>The poor and vulnerable of this country need a champion in the current government, before it is too late for rectification to occur.  They don&#8217;t need some lapdog yapping behind the letterbox, they need a full size barker to chase off the pension and benefit pilferers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/politics-home/197-pollys-poor-defence-of-the-poor/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=197#comment-73</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; Good afternoon Graeme. &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;p&gt; A pun about social mobility hardly hides the fact that it has gone down since Labour came to power. With the dour one&#160;in the wings, I have little hope for the future of the poor. I have always had the suspicion that the Labour Party dislikes social mobility as it involves&#160;people improving their &#039;lot in life&#039; and thereby realising that Conservative policies would be more relevant and appropriate to their daily existence.&#160; &lt;/p&gt;
   &lt;p&gt; So glad to have you back commenting. By the way, belated happy returns for your birthday two weeks ago. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Good afternoon Graeme. </p>
<p> A pun about social mobility hardly hides the fact that it has gone down since Labour came to power. With the dour one&nbsp;in the wings, I have little hope for the future of the poor. I have always had the suspicion that the Labour Party dislikes social mobility as it involves&nbsp;people improving their &#39;lot in life&#39; and thereby realising that Conservative policies would be more relevant and appropriate to their daily existence.&nbsp; </p>
<p> So glad to have you back commenting. By the way, belated happy returns for your birthday two weeks ago. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Hoskin</title>
		<link>http://www.phillip-lee.com/politics-home/197-pollys-poor-defence-of-the-poor/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Hoskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=197#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil, good to see you&#039;re still at it. I don&#039;t quite understand why you&#039;re so quick to defend Tory councils making social care cuts throughout the country. It&#039;s all very well talking about individual responsibility but if you&#039;re extremely frail and need the support of home care in order to stay in your house or if your day centre is being closed then it&#039;s difficult to see what those individuals are supposed to do to take responsibility for their lives. Tory councils throughout the country are cutting services to those most in need. They are also cutting grants to the voluntary groups you praise. Polly&#039;s point was that surely this did not fit with Cameron&#039;s new vision of caring Conservatism. I think you would be better off getting involved in lobbying Tory councils to turn their backs on Thatcherism and consider the effects of their actions on the most in need. I&#039;m unclear how the frail elderly and disabled are going to be empowered by Tory Councils removing care services. Will this enable their social mobility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil, good to see you&#8217;re still at it. I don&#8217;t quite understand why you&#8217;re so quick to defend Tory councils making social care cuts throughout the country. It&#8217;s all very well talking about individual responsibility but if you&#8217;re extremely frail and need the support of home care in order to stay in your house or if your day centre is being closed then it&#8217;s difficult to see what those individuals are supposed to do to take responsibility for their lives. Tory councils throughout the country are cutting services to those most in need. They are also cutting grants to the voluntary groups you praise. Polly&#8217;s point was that surely this did not fit with Cameron&#8217;s new vision of caring Conservatism. I think you would be better off getting involved in lobbying Tory councils to turn their backs on Thatcherism and consider the effects of their actions on the most in need. I&#8217;m unclear how the frail elderly and disabled are going to be empowered by Tory Councils removing care services. Will this enable their social mobility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

